Flash Feed Scroll Reader
Medical Consultation and Surgery

India is the most preferred medical surgery and treatment destination due to major factors favouring it. India has a plethora of Government hospitals and Private Tertiary Care Medical Institutions with International JCI (Joint Commission International) Accreditation. Most of these are among the best in the world. They are well equipped with the latest and most refined technologies. The humane team of internationally trained Consultants and Surgeons in India, supported round-the-clock by specialist clinical teams, ensure total patient care with high success rates. And the cost of Medical consultation and surgeries comes very reasonable. The major surgeries for which foreigners visit India are cited below:

  • Heart/Cardio Surgeries
  • Eye Care
  • Cosmetic treatments
  • Dental Care
  • Orthopaedic Surgeries
  • Organ Transplants
  • Infertility Treatments

 

 

Health & Family welfare:

Health & Family welfare

Back

Union Government (76)

 

State Government (122)

 

Andaman and Nicobar Island (UT) (2)

Andhra Pradesh (6)

Arunachal Pradesh (3)

Assam (2)

Chandigarh (UT) (2)

Chhattisgarh (2)

Delhi (NCT) (8)

Goa (2)

Gujarat (2)

Haryana (3)

Himachal Pradesh (4)

Jammu and Kashmir (1)

Karnataka (5)

Kerala (19)

Lakshadweep (UT) (1)

Madhya Pradesh (8)

Maharashtra (7)

Manipur (1)

Meghalaya (2)

Mizoram (4)

Nagaland (1)

Orissa (3)

Puducherry (UT) (2)

Punjab (5)

Rajasthan (3)

Sikkim (1)

Tamil Nadu (11)

Tripura (3)

Uttarakhand (1)

Uttar Pradesh (8)

 

 

 

Incoming search terms:

  • GOI ORDER NO 2333
  • dhs arogyakeralam alleppey transfer and posting 2012
  • 2333/14447f/fin2012
  • nac kmscl
  • kidney transplant operation at tamilnadu where to get noc from mumbai the place of domicile
  • nrhm req homoeopathic doctor mp 10/5/13
  • to whome have to send RTI fee to cmo uttarakhand
  • vandana pajgade
Ad Space
Search Here
Right to Information Corner
  • Friends GUide me how to frame queries for the followingFriends Suggest me how to frame queries for the following 1 . i want to know rules / procedures to conduct board of directors meeting 2. I want to know the rules / procedures [ bank rules ,section like that ] under which the Presenting officer , inquiry officer , DA followed during disciplinary actions taken against me 3. copies of all the letters / orders / reports recieved from GOI tat concerns reg staffs / employees of the bank 4. i want to know the general rules / procedures to conduct review meetings , deputations , leave sanctioning / rejection , medium to send confidential orders / letters . [ including the bank clause , rule , section ] . 5. The Chairman called me reg review meetings on 10-09-2011. ..i want to know whether he intimated like this to all the branch managers. [no written orders was sent .everything oral only thru phone] . 6. if the chairman didnt intimate to all the BM ie the other staffs intimated to all the branches . then y the chairman particularly intimated to me…. i want to know the reason.
  • RTI Happenings: J&K: Govt denies info under RTI on PSA detentionsReported by Risingkashmir.in on May 21, 2013 Govt denies info under RTI on PSA detentions (http://www.risingkashmir.in/news/govt-denies-info-under-rti-on-psa-detentions-47626.aspx) *Srinagar, May 21: *The government has denied information to an RTI activist about people detained under the Public Safety Act (PSA). An RTI activist Dr Sheikh Ghulam Rasool had filed an RTI application and sought information about the number of persons detained under PSA since January 1989 till December 2012, their name, age and address. Rasool had also sought to know the details of the youth below 17 years of age, who had been booked under PSA in Kashmir during the past 10 years. The RTI activist had also sought information about people imprisoned outside State jails, reasons of shifting them to outside jails and government’s legal stand on it. However, the government has held that this information could not be revealed under the definition of information under RTI Act 2009 and rules thereof. Rasool said information cannot be supplied under Section 8 and 9 of the RTI Act but he had sought information, which falls under Section 4 of the RTI Act. “As per the section, the department has to be proactive in disclosing the information.” He said Kashmiri youth under 17 years of age detained under PSA are being kept in jails with criminals. Rasool had also sought to know the details of court order violations by the jail authorities, the name and rank of the officers who had violated the orders. The government has also denied this information stating that Under Secretary, who deals with prisons and detention, vide his O.M No. Home/RTI/jail/2013/2403 dated April 22, 2013 had intimated that the information was not available. The noted Indian RTI expert Venkatesh Nayak told Rising Kashmir that response of the State government was bureaucratic. “The justification provided by the government that information was being denied because the information sought by the RTI activist was drafted in the form of questions is a very wrong interpretation of the RTI Act,” he said. Nayak, who works for Common Wealth Human Rights Initiatives, an NGO based in New Delhi, said some people don’t have an expertise in seeking information without asking questions and on this pretext they cannot be denied information. He said the Public Information Officer (PIO) cannot deny any information to a citizen of the State that he cannot deny to the Member of Legislative Assembly or Member of Parliament. The State government has stated that the RTI application was forwarded to PIO CID Headquarters J&K, Jammu vide letter No. Home/PIO/59/2013 dated April 15, 2013/ 2242 to provide the information directly to the applicant and also forwarded the RTI application to Under Secretary. The government has also stated that the applicant was at liberty to file an appeal with the 1st Appellant Authority who is the Additional Secretary Legal in the Home Department Civil Secretariat Jammu by June 15, 2013.
  • RTI Question: Transparency officer and CPIO are same person.Hello, In my RTI application I asked for name and designation of the transparency officer. But CPIO has replied that he himself is Transparency Officer. Is it possible?
  • FAA of CIC: "Appellant can file many first appeals"Several times – both on this forum and also offline, I have suggested that an appellant can file a first appeal for each and every response (or no response) of the PIO. This is because of the wordings of Sec 19(1). Many have disagreed. Attached is an order of the FAA of the CIC (central Information Commission) stating that an appellant can file multiple first appeals. Also note that the FAA has hauled up the CPIO of the CIC: Attachment 9150 (http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/attachments/appeals-decisions/9150-faa-cic-appellant-can-file-many-first-appeals-faa-comments.jpg) Full order is attached to this post.
  • When the CPIO replies – How to manage?The usual procedure in RTI, depending on the response and time period, is to put an RTI application, carry on to first appellate authority and take it forward to CIC or SIC, then again follow up with non-compliance complaint to CIC/SIC and/or administrative route. case 1 – Following RTI application and no response from PIO an appeal is sent to FAA. Few days after that a response is received from PIO (not FAA). Reply being unsatisfactory what is the next step? If again a fresh appeal is sent to FAA, the possibility of PIO responding again exists and we can get stuck in this loop for ever. case 2 – RTI application is filed and no response is sent from PIO till filing of non-complaince complaint to CIC/SIC and/or administrative route is followed. The response from CPIO being deviation from the actual facts under question, what should be done?
  • Not Refunding The FeesI (Imran Ishaq Subedar)had got admitted to B.E 1st year for computer science in mentioned college (Yadavrao Tasgaonkar College Of Engg.).As i was leaving nearly 600km away from my home palace, and also i felt inconvenient their,hence i decided to take nearby my home place and i took which is about 50 km away.Before taking i took away mine all original documents from the old college signing under principle claming that i had cancelled my addmission. I have that letter copies with me which is under signed by principle dated 6/9/2010. The cuttoff date for refunding fees was 25/9/2010. When i asked to refunde the fees they just refused to do so,telling that i have crossed the cutt off date where as it was not truth. Thereafter i and my father visited many times to college than at last they returned me the fees of hostel only the small deposit amount whereas the college fees the big amount of Rs66600 has yet been still given and they are refusing to give it.
  • RTI Help: illegal constructionDear All, I am Amit Agarwal, a citizen of India, I have filled a RTI regarding LUCC and building plan of a godown built in the passage of the entry at my place. I received the reply that the LUC had not been submitted and neither the building plan, which says that the godown is illegal. Now, I have written several letters to The Mayor, The Corporation Commissioner to demolish the illegal construction but no such action had been taken. Please help me with the second step so that I can demolish the illegal godown securing the entrance to my residence. Thanks & Regards, Amit Agarwal
  • RTI Court Decision: RTI Judgement Series: MCD's parking lot agreement has no dates, no signaturesReported by Moneylife.in on 21/05/2013 RTI Judgement Series: MCD's parking lot agreement has no dates, no signatures – Moneylife (http://www.moneylife.in/article/rti-judgement-series-mcds-parking-lot-agreement-has-no-dates-no-signatures/32802.html) *MCD's agreement, which was supposedly for five years, allotting the parking lot in Kailash Colony market to Ashiana Security (P) Ltd had neither dates nor proper signature of any recognizable person from the Municipal Corporation. This is the 96th in a series of important judgements given by former Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi that can be used or quoted in an RTI application* The Central Information Commission (CIC) while allowing an appeal directed the Public Information Officer (PIO) of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to provide a complete list of authorised parking licensees as well a list of unauthorised parking licensees in the central zone of the city. While giving this judgement on 12 February 2009, Shailesh Gandhi, the then Central Information Commissioner said, “What is surprising is that a purported agreement allotting the parking lot in Kailash Colony market to Ashiana Security (P) Ltd has no dates on the agreement which is supposedly for five years. There does not even appear to be a proper signature of any recognizable person from MCD.” New Delhi resident S Gopal, on 28 April 2008 sought information about parking lots allotted and details of agreement with contractors in Greater Kailash-I and Kailash Colony. Here is the information he sought under the Right to Information (RTI) Act and the reply given by the PIO… *1. Which are the areas earmarked in Greater Kailash -I and Kailash Colony for public car parking where one has to pay?* PIO's reply: The sketch of the parking allotted by MCD in GK-I and Kailash Colony are enclosed for perusal. *2. What are the terms and conditions under which the parking lot has been contracted out to individuals? A copy of the same may be provided.* PIO's reply: Copy of the terms of condition for parking are also enclosed for kind perusal. *3. Who should be approached for complaints against the contractors of the parking lots? * PIO's reply” Addl. Deputy Commissioner (PPCell) and Deputy Commissioner/ Central Zone. The PIO replied on 24 June 2008, after about 56 days from filing the RTI application. There was no mention of any reply given by the First Appellate Authority (FAA). Gopal then filed his second appeal before the Commission. During the hearing, Mr Gandhi noted the delay in furnishing the information by the PIO. “The PIO has given this information also very late which raises a reasonable doubt about the intentions,” he said. He also noted that the five-year agreement for allotting parking space to a contractor does not have any dates as well as any recognisable signatures from MCD. He then directed the PIO to provide complete list of authorised parking licences as well a list of unauthorised parking licensees in Central Zone to Gopal. Since the PIO did not reply within the mandated 30 days period, the Commission found him guilty under sub-section (1) of Section 7 of the RTI (Right to Information) Act. The CIC then issued a show-cause notice to the PIO asking him to give his reason as to why penalty should not be levied on him. *CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION* *Decision No.* CIC /SG/A/2008/00300/1606 http://rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/SG-12022009-44.pdf *Appeal No.* CIC/SG/A/2008/00300 Appellant : S Gopal, New Delhi-110048 Respondent 1 : Asst. Commissioner & PIO, Municipal Corporation of Delhi Central Zone, Office of the Asst Commissioner Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi – 110024
  • regarding complaint u/s 18 of r.t.i. act-2005Dear sir, can I file a complaint u/s 18 before c.i.c. ? I learned it from google site that this section has been abolished in 2012 when r.t.i. rule was introduced. If the information is wrong, please provide me the complete procedure. Will complaint be filed in two or three set before c.i.c. ? Or I shall have to send one set of complaint to P.I.O. and first appellate authority separately ? Can I send my complaint by speed post ? Can I post my complaint on their web site ?
  • RTI Help: RTI Cell himself decides First Appeal under RTI Act*AS per the RTI Act : while disposing of an appeal, the appellate authority discharges a quasi judicial function and as such his decisions must bear his signature to indicate that he has applied his mind in taking the decision. The usual office procedure has no place in the matters of RTI Act. But in Punjabi Unviersity Patiala (Punjab) the RTI Cell himself prepares decision of FAA in case of First Appeal and that decision is being also prepared by a clerk (See the attachment). In each and every appeal that received in the University Office nor a single decision is prepared himself by the FAA cum Vice Chancellor of University. He only sings on the notings prepared by the RTI Cell on First Appeal. The Clerk prepare the decision, that Sr. Assistant, Incharge RTI Cell, PIO cum Registrar sign the order and in last V.C. only cross sign. The Most interesting fact is that the PIO cum Registrar against the appeal was made also involve in decision making. One more fact in the FAA cases that every decision conveyed to the appellant under the sign of PIO. Yet as per RTI the decision must be conveyed by FAA himself under his signature. *
Next »
India Against Corruption